1st Mosaic - B150 and NGC 6946

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
So with no new astro data coming in since this past May I finally got down to seeing what I could do with my over 30 hours of data on this pair of objects.

This image represented a couple of 1sts for me. First time imaging a dark nebula as my primary object of interest and first time trying to collect and process multiple views to make into a mosaic. There were a number of challenges encountered, but not always in the places in the workflow that I expected them. I had some new artifacts in the red channel that are almost certainly due to some kind of a contaminant on the red filter - I was able to crop those out. I also appear to have gotten some other dust onto the system since I did my flats, so I had to crudely hand edit out a couple of obvious dust spots that were not fixed by my flats. The stitching process though, which I was initially not sure about, went together pretty smoothly in PI. The final result is far from perfect, but I think decent enough to post.

So this is 3 panels stitched together in 'portrait' mode, which is the orientation I had to work with, not being physically at my gear and unable to play with rotating things. This did not allow my to fit Barnard 150 (also called the Seahorse Nebula) into one frame, but when I decided to try a mosaic it was no problem. Once I realized how close the Fireworks Galaxy (NGC 6946) was, I decided well might as well try to include that too. The Fireworks Galaxy is so named because of the very high rate of star formation, probably induced from a previous interaction with another galaxy. Even in this small version the pink Hα star forming regions can start to be seen. This is an even more impressive target with more magnification than I can get with my currently mounted 580mm telescope. I am not sure but I think the faint red portions wisping through the image are actual faint clouds of ionized hydrogen, but I cannot verify that.

I ended up with approximately 10 hours of data on each of the 3 panels. Full collection details follow the image. And for those who want to zoom in, a higher resolution version is seen here on AB:



B150 and NGC 6946:

LRCC_sRGB_FW_sRGB_B150_NGC6946_Mosaic_crop_BN_PSCC_HT_STF_EZSR2_DSE_ABE_LHE_CT_SCNR.jpg



Equipment:
ZWO ASI1600MM-C Camera @ -15C and
Gain:139 Offset:21 (Unity Gain)
Software Bisque MyT Mount
Stellarvue SVQ100 Astrograph Refractor, 580mm @ f/5.8
Innovations Foresight ONAG

Software:
Pixinsight Commercial Version 1.8
Lightroom CC
Photoshop CC
Innovations Foresight SkyGuard

Light Frames:
Red:159 x 240 secs (10 hrs 36 mins)
Green:158 x 240 secs (10 hrs 32 mins)
Blue: 136 x 240 secs (9 hrs 04 mins)


30 hrs 12 mins total integration time

Dark Frames:

10 x 240 secs (40 mins)

Bias Frames
60

Flat Frames
10 each filter

Comments and critiques welcome!

ML
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
The Fireworks galaxy is the spiral in the upper right? That sure looks great, that would be worth a closer look.

Very nice work with the dark nebula, I am glad you went to work on this detail.

Since your gear is remote now, and you aren’t there while capturing, it just dawned on me that while you own this gear, it’s no different then obtaining data from any remote observatory. So maybe you should get remote data from another telescope so you can process it while you wait for more of your remote data? A few of the remote sites I checked into actually would let you aim their telescope wherever in the sky you wanted, so then it feels more like your data.
 

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
The Fireworks galaxy is the spiral in the upper right? That sure looks great, that would be worth a closer look.

Very nice work with the dark nebula, I am glad you went to work on this detail.

Since your gear is remote now, and you aren’t there while capturing, it just dawned on me that while you own this gear, it’s no different then obtaining data from any remote observatory. So maybe you should get remote data from another telescope so you can process it while you wait for more of your remote data? A few of the remote sites I checked into actually would let you aim their telescope wherever in the sky you wanted, so then it feels more like your data.

Jim,

I appreciate your feedback on the image.

It is of course a matter of opinion, but for me, it is VERY different using someone else's gear to collect the data. In my case, I am one the one who did the research on what gear to buy, saved up to buy it, and then did the 'system engineering' to get it all connected together and working correctly long enough to actually take some useful data and then process it, and in this case also having to make allowances for whatever the current issues might be in order to get the best final image I can out of it. I don't consider the fact that I am not actually required to be standing next to my equipment while it is running to diminish what I am required to do to make the whole system work, and in fact, running the gear remotely adds another layer of complexity to the accomplishment in my mind. There is of course nothing wrong with acquiring remote collected data off of gear owned by someone else, but if I am not responsible for making sure the gear works correctly together then it just doesn't seem like the same level of accomplishment to me. To each his own of course.

ML
 
So with no new astro data coming in since this past May I finally got down to seeing what I could do with my over 30 hours of data on this pair of objects.

This image represented a couple of 1sts for me. First time imaging a dark nebula as my primary object of interest and first time trying to collect and process multiple views to make into a mosaic. There were a number of challenges encountered, but not always in the places in the workflow that I expected them. I had some new artifacts in the red channel that are almost certainly due to some kind of a contaminant on the red filter - I was able to crop those out. I also appear to have gotten some other dust onto the system since I did my flats, so I had to crudely hand edit out a couple of obvious dust spots that were not fixed by my flats. The stitching process though, which I was initially not sure about, went together pretty smoothly in PI. The final result is far from perfect, but I think decent enough to post.

So this is 3 panels stitched together in 'portrait' mode, which is the orientation I had to work with, not being physically at my gear and unable to play with rotating things. This did not allow my to fit Barnard 150 (also called the Seahorse Nebula) into one frame, but when I decided to try a mosaic it was no problem. Once I realized how close the Fireworks Galaxy (NGC 6946) was, I decided well might as well try to include that too. The Fireworks Galaxy is so named because of the very high rate of star formation, probably induced from a previous interaction with another galaxy. Even in this small version the pink Hα star forming regions can start to be seen. This is an even more impressive target with more magnification than I can get with my currently mounted 580mm telescope. I am not sure but I think the faint red portions wisping through the image are actual faint clouds of ionized hydrogen, but I cannot verify that.

I ended up with approximately 10 hours of data on each of the 3 panels. Full collection details follow the image. And for those who want to zoom in, a higher resolution version is seen here on AB:



B150 and NGC 6946:

View attachment 44076


Equipment:
ZWO ASI1600MM-C Camera @ -15C and
Gain:139 Offset:21 (Unity Gain)
Software Bisque MyT Mount
Stellarvue SVQ100 Astrograph Refractor, 580mm @ f/5.8
Innovations Foresight ONAG

Software:
Pixinsight Commercial Version 1.8
Lightroom CC
Photoshop CC
Innovations Foresight SkyGuard

Light Frames:
Red:159 x 240 secs (10 hrs 36 mins)
Green:158 x 240 secs (10 hrs 32 mins)
Blue: 136 x 240 secs (9 hrs 04 mins)


30 hrs 12 mins total integration time

Dark Frames:

10 x 240 secs (40 mins)

Bias Frames
60

Flat Frames
10 each filter

Comments and critiques welcome!

ML

Mike, thanks for the detailed explanation, I am still learning the ropes.

Oliver
 
Top Bottom