Yosemite Falls

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
The frame is filled nicely John! While there is a bit of WA distortion from pointing up with the trees leaning a bit, it's not bothersome at all, there are enough of the very tall trees that the framing works. One of the little details that I like in this is that you composed it so that Lower Yosemite Falls is also seen in a small gap between the trees on the left.

Very nice work here I would say!
 

JohnC

Well-Known Member
The frame is filled nicely John! While there is a bit of WA distortion from pointing up with the trees leaning a bit, it's not bothersome at all, there are enough of the very tall trees that the framing works. One of the little details that I like in this is that you composed it so that Lower Yosemite Falls is also seen in a small gap between the trees on the left.

Very nice work here I would say!
Good eye Jim. I did correct for the trees in post, but in nature there is a true curve. Those trees absolutely are not straight in real life. I’m not honestly sure where reality and technology cross. And yes, I did specifically include the lower fall between the trees.

I’ve processed this photo a few times trying to find the right balance of saturation/vibrancy. Previous efforts bordered on too much. This one may be a bit too little. I’ve been chasing my tail on it.
 

AlanLichty

Moderator
I like the way this image is framed and it's easy on the eyes for the web view.

I wouldn't want to see too much more saturation/vibrancy from where you are right now. You are borderline to an unnatural feel to the bark saturation/contrast on the foreground trees already and the trees on the far side of the meadow are pushing it a bit as well. The dynamic range in this shot is quite wide so taming all of the light isn't an easy task.
 

JohnC

Well-Known Member
I like the way this image is framed and it's easy on the eyes for the web view.

I wouldn't want to see too much more saturation/vibrancy from where you are right now. You are borderline to an unnatural feel to the bark saturation/contrast on the foreground trees already and the trees on the far side of the meadow are pushing it a bit as well. The dynamic range in this shot is quite wide so taming all of the light isn't an easy task.
Thank you. I would tend to agree with you which is why I stopped where I did. But the longer I look at it (since I actually processed it) I feel like maybe I should try again. LoL! I have that problem a lot. :D
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Thank you. I would tend to agree with you which is why I stopped where I did. But the longer I look at it (since I actually processed it) I feel like maybe I should try again. LoL! I have that problem a lot. :D
Yeah, I totally feel for you on knowing when to stop on the processing. Most times I will sleep on my processing, and most times when I wake up and look at it with fresh eyes, I will crank up the contrast a bit more or do an additional nudge to the saturation.

You want a good laugh, check out this thread: http://www.focalworld.com/index.php?threads/what-was-i-thinking.3812/

BTW, I think for my taste at least you have the saturation nailed perfectly.
 

JohnC

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I totally feel for you on knowing when to stop on the processing. Most times I will sleep on my processing, and most times when I wake up and look at it with fresh eyes, I will crank up the contrast a bit more or do an additional nudge to the saturation.

You want a good laugh, check out this thread: http://www.focalworld.com/index.php?threads/what-was-i-thinking.3812/

BTW, I think for my taste at least you have the saturation nailed perfectly.
LoL! I wish it only lasted through the next day. When I like a photo, it can go on for months. I’m way too anal. :D

BTW, I can’t find a laughing emoji. Am I looking in the wrong places?
 

JohnC

Well-Known Member
I knew this was going to be a good one, John when I saw it as your avatar. I think it is exactly the right tone.
Thanks Douglas. The avatar doesn’t do it justice due to the aspect ratio. But I decided to make the avatar for a different forum last year and was just too lazy to think about a new one here.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
LoL! I wish it only lasted through the next day. When I like a photo, it can go on for months. I’m way too anal. :D

BTW, I can’t find a laughing emoji. Am I looking in the wrong places?
Sadly :( we only have a :confused: limited number :oops: of emojis :eek:
 
Top Bottom