This is from Little Corona in Corona Del Mar in SoCal. It's one from the archives, and I have found it's interesting sometimes when I look through the archives at certain shots like this and I wonder if today I would have been able to capture it differently?
For instance shooting into the sun here which I wanted to do so that the waves would get backlit and hopefully some of the panes of water would turn golden like they stained glass. But that left me with a sun that was burning out part of the sky and water where it was just so bright. If shot it today with todays camera could those areas not be blown out? Would I want them not to be blown out? After all it was bright. I also thought, could I have shot it without the sun in the photo? Often I will try the same shot but with the sun just out of the frame. But in this case I was going after the line of the dancing waves, and had I moved it so the sun was out of the frame, then the dancing waves would no longer be parallel to the frame of the photo. If you got this far, you can see I have been asking lots of questions today....
Here it is,
Jim
For instance shooting into the sun here which I wanted to do so that the waves would get backlit and hopefully some of the panes of water would turn golden like they stained glass. But that left me with a sun that was burning out part of the sky and water where it was just so bright. If shot it today with todays camera could those areas not be blown out? Would I want them not to be blown out? After all it was bright. I also thought, could I have shot it without the sun in the photo? Often I will try the same shot but with the sun just out of the frame. But in this case I was going after the line of the dancing waves, and had I moved it so the sun was out of the frame, then the dancing waves would no longer be parallel to the frame of the photo. If you got this far, you can see I have been asking lots of questions today....
Here it is,
Jim