Flaming Star Nebula Stars or no Stars?

Comet Hunter

Supporting Member
New User to Focal World
Image is the IC 405 taken 1/30/2022
Stellarvue SVX102 raptor telescope
ASI2600 MC Pro Camera
EQ6R Pro mount
Asiair Pro with EAF
Processed in Pixinsight using (95) 5 min sub light frames just under 8 hours
I love the images with no stars, but with stars is more astronomical
Clear Skies
Ed
Clear
IC405_SV_rev4.2.jpg
IC405_SV_Starless_rev3.jpg
 

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
Nice rendition - lots of detail. The detail does show out more when the stars are removed, but in the end I have found that my preference for a final image is one that almost always includes the stars, unless there are issues with the stars themselves. It is very much a personal preference thing though. Since I also have a preference for taking separate data to use for RGB stars, that gives me an advantage on keeping my stars smaller, and with all the great star reduction scripts and tools out there these days, it is easy to tweak that to taste. So I find the nebulosity can still pop with a nicely colored and controlled starfield included. That's what I did on my recently posted version of this same target.

Cool job, I like them both, thanks for posting.

ML
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Hey Ed!

Welcome to FocalWorld!

It's so awesome having you join us. And what great intro's! The Flaming Star is one I have only recently imaged, and I never got as much detail as you got. I like seeing all of this detail.

I like seeing these sometimes without stars. Everyone edits them with stars or adds them back in. But I wish we would see these without stars more often, I have done that a few times, but I need to post my starless images more often too.

I am going to check these out again when I get to my daughters tonight and can setup my laptop as these need to be viewed large!
 

AlanLichty

Moderator
Welcome to Focal World. Amazing level of detail and depth. I am not an astro photographer but I do like seeing work like this. I like the version with the stars included in this case.
 
Top Bottom