New Scope Online - 1st Image - NGC2903

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
So it has taken a little while to get my new (purchased used but new to me) higher magnification scope online. It started out with collimation problems, and then I had to work through a few issues with getting the new setup to run under NINA and also some issues with focus and star sizes. Predictably, I am not completely sure I have everything optimized, but the results I have gotten on this target, a smaller galaxy that is just not very impressive through my 4" refractor, are the kind of results I was at least hoping for when I decided to add this scope to my arsenal.

This galaxy is about 13 x 6 arcminutes is size, and is imaged here with the EdgeHD 9.25 inch scope and a 0.7x reducer, yielding 1645mm of focal length at f/7. This is using my older ASI1600 mono camera that was moved from the refractor to make way for the larger and newer QHY268M camera. As I have stated elsewhere, after a couple of years perfecting my post processiong for narrowband nebula targets, I am finding the RGB processing to be trickier than I would have thought. On this image the colors and especially the stars (which were removed for stretching the galaxy and then added back in later) really were a time sink to get acceptable, and I still see some issues with them, but the colors are nice and I think all is mostly well with the end result, but of course, as always, I am keenly interested to get feedback from all of you on the end result.

This is made from 7 hours and 42 mins of data, although almost 12 hours of data were collected, much under periods of bright moonlight. Subframes were discarded due to eccentricity or FWHM issues, and the almost 2 hours of Hα data was not used at all as it just did not combine well, although the reddish magenta star forming regions do seem to have come through quite well with just the RGB filters anyway.

From Wikipedia:
NGC 2903 is an isolated barred spiral galaxy in the equatorial constellation of Leo, positioned about 1.5° due south of Lambda Leonis.[10] It was discovered by German-born astronomer William Herschel, who cataloged it on November 16, 1784. He mistook it as a double nebula, as did subsequent observers, and it wasn't until the nineteenth century that the Third Earl of Rosse resolved into a spiral form.[5] J. L. E. Dreyer assigned it the identifiers 2903 and 2905 in his New General Catalogue; NGC 2905 now designates a luminous knot in the northeastern spiral arm.[11]

This field galaxy[12] is located about 30[3] million light-years away from the Milky Way, and is a member of the Virgo Supercluster.[4]

LRCC_sRGB_FW_NGC2902_RGB_WithStars.jpg


Equipment:
ZWO ASI1600MM-C Camera @ -10C and
Gain:139 Offset:21
Software Bisque MyT Mount
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 SCT w/0.7x Reducer, 1645mm @ f/7
Primaluce Labs Esatto 2" Autofocuser

Software:
Pixinsight Commercial Version 1.8
Lightroom CC
Photoshop CC
Innovations Foresight SkyGuard

Light Frames:
Red: 48 x 180 secs (2 hrs 24 mins)
Green: 58 x 180 secs 2 hrs 54 mins)
Blue: 48 x 180 secs (2 hrs 24 mins)

7 hrs 42 mins total

Dark Frames:
10 x 180 secs, LRGB (30 mins)

Bias Frames
60

Flat Frames
20 each filter
 

Ben Egbert

Forum Helper
Staff member
I can’t believe how much time and effort is required for these images. But we’ll worth it. Is this rig remote? Just so much more effort. Not to mention the degree of self education you have acquired. My hat is off to you
 

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
Thanks everyone for the kind comments. All the work is worth it when things come together and you are able to produce images you like.

To answer your question Ben (@Ben Egbert), yes, the rig is remote down in southern AZ at a fellow astroimager's house who obviously (given the amount of assistance he gives me) is a good friend of mine. So it is always a collaborative effort when problems arise. I have been down there once in person and plan to go down again sometime this year to make some upgrades to things. It is a very unique situation for me to be able to image this way, as the sky visibility, weather, and the seeing (air stability) are all better down there than I would get up here in CO at my house. Normally remote imaging hosting sites charge between $400 - say $700 or even more per month for this kind of service where I am able to do this for free so not sure how long I have this opportunity available but I am obviously going to take advantage of it while I can.

ML
 

DavidWright2010

Well-Known Member
Thanks everyone for the kind comments. All the work is worth it when things come together and you are able to produce images you like.

To answer your question Ben (@Ben Egbert), yes, the rig is remote down in southern AZ at a fellow astroimager's house who obviously (given the amount of assistance he gives me) is a good friend of mine. So it is always a collaborative effort when problems arise. I have been down there once in person and plan to go down again sometime this year to make some upgrades to things. It is a very unique situation for me to be able to image this way, as the sky visibility, weather, and the seeing (air stability) are all better down there than I would get up here in CO at my house. Normally remote imaging hosting sites charge between $400 - say $700 or even more per month for this kind of service where I am able to do this for free so not sure how long I have this opportunity available but I am obviously going to take advantage of it while I can.

ML
That's a really nice result. Lucky you to have a friend down there. I've always used a regular camera (albeit H-alpha modded if I'm imaging an emission nebula), but it seems that the best results - like yours - use an astro camera and filters.

David
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
That's a really nice result. Lucky you to have a friend down there. I've always used a regular camera (albeit H-alpha modded if I'm imaging an emission nebula), but it seems that the best results - like yours - use an astro camera and filters.

David
Hey David, I used my Nikon D850 for 2 years before I upgraded to the ASI2600mc Pro, and I would have to say it doubled my quaility. My D850 isn't Astro modified but it's rated very high for getting the Ha signal. The ability to run the Astro camera cooled is so huge.
 

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
That's a really nice result. Lucky you to have a friend down there. I've always used a regular camera (albeit H-alpha modded if I'm imaging an emission nebula), but it seems that the best results - like yours - use an astro camera and filters.

David

david,

Thanks for the reply and feedback. While there are some reasons that monochrome cooled cameras with separate filters have advantages over one shot color cameras like your DSLR, I would say the practical gap in achievable results has continued to diminish, with just wonderful images being produced with OSC cameras. Lots of great filters out there to not only block light pollution but accentuate even narrowband wavelengths, once only effectively imaged by mono cameras. With your modded camera you are likely in good shape. After that it is mostly about location (dark skies with good seeing help a lot) and then time on target.

ML
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Hey Mike, this looks great. I am busy driving to Factory Butte, so I will have to wait to read what you wrote until later, but the image looks great.
 

Mike Lewis

Staff Member
Chuck,

Thanks so much. I'd say things are getting started well with the Edge 9.25 for sure, hopefully I can continue to have success with it.

ML
 
Top Bottom